St Margarets Parish Churchyard - Rainham

LOCATION:

The site is found on High Street, Rainham, Kent. The nearest station is Rainham which is a couple of minutes walk from it.

FIRST OPENED:

The church seemed to have been built sometime in the late 1200, so it os possible that the site was around at that time also.

FAMOUS RESIDENTS:

Thomas Norreys – A comissioner of the navy who died in 1624

ALSO KNOWN AS:

N/A

SIZE & LAYOUT:

The land is said to be about 30 acres, although, I do not think that is very accurate. The layout is near enough a triangle shape that is situated on a small hill.

THE WALKABOUT:

As Rainham was where my boyfriend used to live, I am suprised that I hadn't actually done this one sooner. I suppose that I half expected it to be a tiny little churchyard on a busy road that was not that well looked after. Well, it is safe to say that I was very much wrong. Like I said, the site is on a main road, and quite a busy one at that. What is charming though is that it sits on a little hill which lets it overlook the rest of the town. On one side you have a community center and on the other you have an estate. This cuts the privacy severely and makes it less peaceful than it should be, due to a cut through path that runs through it for public access.

When you approach the site, you are met with a mixed set of graves. You have some very old and weathered ones mixed in with fairly recent ones. This has always seemed a bit strange to me as when that happens, it means that an old one has been removed and placed with the new one. Something that I absolutely detest. There is a fair amount of greenery here to which is quite refreshing considering its location. The church over looking it all is rather spectacular. I have seen it at night time and they way it looms over is very beautiful if not slightly creepy.

The biggest suprise of this site is actually the size. To look at it from the front you would think that it is actually quite small. Go around the back however and you will see that it is very much bigger. There are lines of trees ( that almost make an enclosed kind of tunnel) and lots of little archways. again made by the trees. I would love to see this place in the middle of the summer with all the blossom from the trees blowing around. It really would be like something out of a fairy tale. I could not believe how beautiful it was behind the church.

Ufortunatley, most of the old graves are either damaged or unreadable. Whether this is down to vandalism, neglect or both, I don't know but it is such a shame. The one thing I would like to point out, which I have not seen in another graveyard yet, is that near the back entrance of the church they have 3 very large gravestones. On these gravestones, on both sides, are what appears to be, a record of all of the graves in the site. At first I thought they were war memorials, which is not uncommon, but looking at the dates, there are some that are recent deaths and who weren't that old. Whatever it was intended to be, it certainly helped add a little bit of character.

ANY GHOSTS?:

In some of my photos I found some weird looking orbs. Although, on further inspection, these turned out to be little bits of blossom that were falling from the trees. There was one thing that slightly bothered me. As I was looking through my photos, I seen what appeared to be a shadow figure next to the church door. I left my laptop for a few minutes so that i could get some tracing paper (something that I use to help me determine shapes), but when I returned, the shape was gone. Obviously, there could be a chance that I thought that I had seen something, but I am not usually one for doing that. I was slightly disturbed by this, I wonder if I maybe caught something that really did not want to be seen?

FINAL (RESTING) WORD:

From the front, I was in awe with the church. From the back however, it was the graveyard that certainly had my attention. It really is a deceptively beautiful place. I only wish that a bit more care was put into it and that more effort was made with the front of the site. If you like to explore a little, then this is the place. For a churchyard, it certainly has a magical feel to it.

“Respect those who are not physically here, you can’t see them but they can see you, and disrespect is something they don’t want to see”

RATING: 3/5 - If it hadn't been on a main road then it would pretty much be perfect.

LINKS: http://rainhamchurch.wordpress.com/

Rochester Cathedral Graveyard & Burial Grounds

LOCATION:

The site can be found on Boley Hill. The site can be easily reached to from both Rochester and Strood station. There are also a number of buses that pass through that way.

FIRST OPENED:

The site in which you see now was consecrated on December 1423. However, an original Saxon church was built in 604 so it is possible that there could be an even older burial site under the one that stands now.

FAMOUS RESIDENTS:

The Dorrit Family – A well respected family of the area at that time.

ALSO KNOWN AS:

The site may sometimes be referred to as The cathedral burial grounds or simply the castle burial grounds. Rochester cathedral churchyard is another name that it may be referred to as.

SIZE & LAYOUT:

When it was first used it was roughly half an acre. Once the next bit of land was bought, that took it up to roughly double its size at one acre. The site next to the cathedral is a slim triangle shape. The part in front is long and rectangular and the castle ground is a big bit of lawn.

THE WALKABOUT:

To start off with, the graveyard next to the cathedral is very small so a walkabout was not really needed. Another point I would like to make before carrying on is that, the graveyard site found at the moat around the castle is not really considered to be part of the same cemetery, but for the sake of the blog, I will include it as it is within the proximity. For most people, they could easily miss the main graveyard as it lies in the shadow of the grand Rochester cathedral. The cathedral itself was consecrated in December 1423, however, a much older Saxon church was there in 604. It is highly possible that there could be even older burials there, although they have not been found yet. There could also be a chance that these may have been pagan burials, hence why they won't be recorded. The church yard was extended when the Vestry of St Nicholas bought a piece of land from The Right Hon George, Earl of Jersey for £300. It is not known whether the negotiations were sucessful or not.

It is said that the part out the front of the cathedral used to be 5ft higher and the stones were actually upright. This is a shame that it is not this way anymore as I think that it would have looked far more appealing. The stones are now laid flat, most of them with no writting on them anymore due to severe weathering. In the middle of it all is a large ancient tree that is reputed to be about 150 years old. There is another tree in the smaller site which looks the same but I am not sure if it is the same one. The wall around the small site used to be about 16ft but now it is only about 2-3 ft.

Despite its size, it really has maintained that almost ancient quality. The fact that it is in 2 (possibly 3 parts) can seem a bit daunting due to the uncertainty of its origins. The graves on the bit in front and the moat are very sparse and very few. It is such a shame that you cannot learn more history from them. Despite their wear and tear, the site is very well looked after. There is a gravestone dedicated to the Dorriit family, who were a well to do family in their time. They are also supposedly the inspiration for Charles Dickens Little Dorrit.

The best part about visiting this place has to be the view. You have the cathedral right next to it and straight in front of it you have the magnificent Rochester castle. The pathways are stone cobbled (the pathway in front of the site is actually a very old roadway). I only wish there was more that I could write about it. It's beauty is outstanding if not slightly understated.

ANY GHOSTS?:

I myself did not catch anything, apart from some interesting photos in the crypt in the cathedral. However, there is an old ghost story surrounding Charles Dickens. It is said that he wished to be buried in the burial ground as he loved Rochester very much. When he died however, it was not allowed and instead, he was buried in the poets corner in Westminster. Every boxing day (or another day depending on who is telling the tale) he is said to walk the moat grounds at midnight. I may at some point try and do an investigation around that time and see what results I can come up with.

FINAL (RESTING) WORD:

I certainly had a difficult time trying to accertain whether the graveyards were all in one or separate. This only added to the adventure however, delving into my other passion: history. I wish that this place was bigger somehow, I feel a place as grand as Rochester almost deserves the big cemeteries you see in london and Britains other capitals. I cannot complain about its beauty and simplicity however, the fact that it has so few only adds to the historic mystery and gives it that status it so rightly deserves. There is plenty more to see here so it is definatly worth taking the time to come and see it.

“Respect those who are not physically here, you can’t see them but they can see you, and disrespect is something they don’t want to see”

RATING: 4/5 - Quite small but its beauty surpasses it.

LINKS: The graveyard doesn't have a direct website but the cathedral and castle do so you may find out some more information on there.